Skip to content →

Techniques of Objective Psychological Assessment

(4-28-09)

Guest lecture on Behavioral Assessment: observation, self-monitoring, role-laying

Observational assessment

in situ assessment, naturalistic observation

  • possible advantages:
    • focus on overt, “objective” events of immediate clinical relevance: if clear, reliable, valid categories for observation are constructed
    • deals with situational specificity of much human behavior: if relevant settings/times to observe are chosen
    • captures the environment aspect of the person x environment interaction: if meaningful stimuli as well as responses are recorded
  • issues:
    • labor intensive
    • possible reactivity to observation
    • observer reliability, observer drift
  • Common variations: parental observation of children; spousal/partner observation
  • Pragmatic/how-to considerations:
    • frequency/duration/severity (intensity) measures
    • time sampling/frequency & scheduling
    • records and analysis (what do you do with the data after you have it)

Self-monitoring by clients

  • possible advantages:
    • gather naturalistic data
    • contribute to greater client self-awareness/client education
    • more practical than extrinsic observation
    • private events (thoughts, feelings) can be assessed
  • issues:
    • reliability
    • reactivity
    • effort needed by client/resistance
  • Pragmatic/how-to considerations:
    • immediate recording more accurate
    • paper-and-pen vs. electronic (PDA’s, smart phones, texting)
    • instances, actions/mental content, environmental cues, severity/degree of belief ratings

Role-played/in session observation

  • possible advantages:
    • captures behavior client not aware of (nonverbal responses, verbal mannerisms)
    • more efficient and practical than in situ observation
  • Common variation: videotaping for feedback
  • issues:
    • similar to others: reliability, validity, stress for client
    • “behavioral” role-plays tend to be brief with specific objectives (identification of next target to work on)
    • identification of strengths as well as weaknesses essential
    • assessment blends naturally into treatment
  • Pragmatic/how-to considerations:
    • stock scenes vs. actual reconstructions
    • heuristic for selection of treatment targets:
      • eye contact
      • posture
      • gestures
      • voice loudness
      • voice tone
      • verbal content
Skip to toolbar